Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Putnam County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1976PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This is a suit to recover city and county ad valorem property taxes paid under protest. The Chancellor sustained a motion made pursuant to Rule 12.02 Tenn.R.Civ.P. and dismissed the action.

I

Taxpayer owned certain real estate located in Monterey, Putnam County, Tennessee, which she had agreed to sell to certain individual purchasers but for the ultimate use and benefit of a Cookeville bank which contemplated its use as the site of a branch office. As a condition of the conveyance grantees demanded that all property taxes be paid. Pursuant to this demand, and in order to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. McHale v. WellmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Railroad v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Prescott v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Cook v. Spinnaker's of Rivergate, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API