Holloway v. Putnam County
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This is a suit to recover city and county ad valorem property taxes paid under protest. The Chancellor sustained a motion made pursuant to Rule 12.02 Tenn.R.Civ.P. and dismissed the action.
I
Taxpayer owned certain real estate located in Monterey, Putnam County, Tennessee, which she had agreed to sell to certain individual purchasers but for the ultimate use and benefit of a Cookeville bank which contemplated its use as the site of a branch office. As a condition of the conveyance grantees demanded that all property taxes be paid. Pursuant to this demand, and in order to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- McHale v. WellmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Railroad v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Prescott v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Cook v. Spinnaker's of Rivergate, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Creech v. AddingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.