Legal Opinion
United States v. Coccia
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 5, 2006No. 03-1674PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Larry Coccia appeals, on several grounds, his conviction for possession of a firearm while subject to a domestic restraining order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). We affirm.
I
We present the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict, see United States v. Boulerice, 325 F.3d 75, 79 (1st Cir.2003), reserving a discussion of some facts for our analysis. Coccia, a retired U.S. Air Force officer, was in the midst of a difficult divorce in Pennsylvania in 2001. A Pennsylvania family court had issued a domestic restraining order against Coccia on April 2,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Alison Taylor v. City of SaginawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Matalon v. HynnesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Kenneth McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.