Legal Opinion

Estate of Grant

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1935No. L. A. 14548PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

U. S.Grant, Jr., died leaving a last will and testament in which his wife, the respondent, America W. Grant, was named as the executrix thereof, and as his sole devisee. Upon her appointment as such executrix she duly published notice to creditors, and within the time provided by law for the presentation of claims two claims were presented and allowed against said estate, one by S. A. Reed in the sum of $457.03, and the other by the trustees of George J. Keating Medical Fund in the sum of $7,200. The last-mentioned claim was secured by a mortgage upon real property belonging to said deceased.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of MacHadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In re the Estate of HildebrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rosborough v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Kessler v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. In re Estate of TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of DupontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Grant v. De OtteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Roach v. HostetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API