Legal Opinion

Sartwell v. North

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 22, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Contract, by the assignees in insolvency of the firm of Fitz and Martin, against Charles H. North and S. H. Skilton, co-partners under the firm name of Charles H. North and Company, to recover $610, alleged to have been obtained of Fitz and Martin by the defendants as a fraudulent preference.

Read the full summary

Contract, by the assignees in insolvency of the firm of Fitz and Martin, against Charles H. North and S. H. Skilton, co-partners under the firm name of Charles H. North and Company, to recover $610, alleged to have been obtained of Fitz and Martin by the defendants as a fraudulent preference. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Knowlton, J., who reported the case for the determination of this court, in substance as follows: It appeared that, on October 14, 1884, the defendants caused a writ to be made in their favor against said Fitz and Martin, returnable to the Municipal…

1Opinion of the CourtC. Allen, J.

The questions of law which the report in the present case seems intended to present relate only to the alleged preference which was obtained by the levy of the execution, and are as follows:

1. Whether, according to the true meaning of the Pub. Sts. c. 157, § 96, making fraudulent preferences by an insolvent debtor void, the act relied on should be considered to have been done with the view, on the part of Fitz and Martin, the insolvent debtors, to give a preference to their creditors North and Company ; that is to say, whether, upon the facts stated, such a view or intention should be imputed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Moulton v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Rogers v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Forbes v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Shattuck v. BillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. P. C. Hanford Oil Co. v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. American Export & Inland Coal Corp. v. Matthew Addy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hewitt v. Boston Straw Board Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API