Shellhorn v. Brad Ragan, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal. Although this Court denied petition for certiorari on 8 December 1977, we now treat the appeal as a petition for review by way of certiorari. The petition is granted. The plaintiffs motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Defendants’ first assignment of error is to the granting of plaintiff’s discovery motion to produce documents, challenging the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law: [T]he documents requested by plaintiff are relevant to the first five Claims for Relief, in that such documents appear to be reasonably…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by38 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Reese v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Adams v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Reese v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Mims v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.