Legal Opinion

Reese v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 2009No. COA08-397PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiff’s complaint made clear references to the events memorialized in a Resolution, the trial court did not err in considering the document in deciding defendants’ Rule 12(c) motion to dismiss, even though the document itself was not specifically referenced in the complaint. The transactions encompassed by an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and Mecklenburg County were authorized by the General Statutes and Local Acts of the North Carolina General Assembly. Plaintiff’s constitutional claims were based upon a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. PrevatteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reese v. BROOKLYN VILLAGE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Reese v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Coventry Woods Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Albright v. Vining-Sparks Secs., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2019
  5. Buckley LLP v. Series 1 of Oxford Ins. Co. N.C.North Carolina Business Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API