Legal Opinion

Gabb Wireless v. Troomi Wireless

District Court, D. Utah

Decided January 14, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00253Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION GABB WIRELESS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. Case No. 2:21-cv-253-TC-DAO TROOMI WIRELESS, INC., a Delaware corporation; WILLIAM BRADY, an individual; and DAVID L. PREECE, an individual, Defendants. Plaintiff Gabb Wireless, Inc. (Gabb) brings six causes of action, including two claims that Defendants Troomi Wireless, Inc., William Brady, and David Preece violated its rights under the Lanham Act in connection with the trademark “Troomi.” Defendants have filed a Rule…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API