Legal Opinion

Greeson v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1981No. 8115DC262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

We note at the outset that defendant’s argument that the court erred in admitting evidence of plaintiffs willingness to secure substitute performance of the contract is well taken. A farm lease (sharecropping) agreement is personal in nature and thus non-assignable without the landlord’s consent since the landlord’s receipts under the contract are directly related to the lessee’s skill and industry. See 49 Am. Jur. 2d, Landlord and Tenant, Sec. 400. However, for the reasons set forth below, we find it unnecessary to reach the question of whether this error was prejudicial.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parker v. Brown.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnny Overstreet, Administrator of the Estate of David Wilkey, Deceased v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re the Estate of SauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Wing v. Town of LandisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. McGarity v. CRAIGHILL, RENDLEMAN, INGLE & BLYTHE, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Bdm Investments v. Lenhil, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API