State ex rel. Tweed v. Columbus Parcel Services, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in finding the relators to be only partially dependent on their natural father at the time of his death. In order to determine whether an abuse of discretion has occurred we need only determine whether there is “some evidence” to support the commission’s finding. See State, ex rel. Wallace, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 55, 58. Or, as stated in Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 127, at 129: “ * * * only where there is no evidence of probative value in the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Wallace v. Industrlal CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
- State ex rel. City Iron Works, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krupa v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State ex rel. Barbee v. Midland Concrete & Sand Transp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025