Legal Opinion

Township of Middletown v. N/E Regional Office, United States Postal Service

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1985No. Crim. A. 84-00185PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERRY, District Judge.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The present action was commenced in June 1984 in the Municipal Court of the Township of Middletown. The summons and complaint issued by the Municipal Court named as the defendant the N/E Regional Office of the United States Postal Service. It was served upon Seymour Weiner, an official of the Postal Service, and charges the Postal Service with violations of Township zoning ordinances. In short, the complaint charges that the Postal Service failed to obtain land development permits and necessary approvals prior to attempting to clear the land in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hancock v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mayo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. IMFC Professional Services of Florida, Inc. v. Latin American Home Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Thornton v. Village of RidgewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Crivello v. Board of Adjust. of Borough of MiddlesexDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Continental Cablevision of St. Paul, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. CH v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
  3. Roche v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  4. Alabama v. BowsherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  5. Fabiano v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API