Mahok v. State

Appellant was charged with possessing intoxicating liquor, and that he had theretofore been twice convicted of offenses defined by §4, ch. 48, Acts 1925, §2717 Burns 1926. The finding was guilty as charged, and judgment was imprisonment in the Indiana State Prison for not less than one nor more than two years.

Error is assigned upon the overruling of motion for a new trial, for the causes that: (1) The finding of "the court is contrary to law; and (2) the finding of the court is. not sustained by sufficient evidence.

Under the first cause for his reason for a new trial, appellant proposes that,…