Simpson v. State

Appellant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor in an automobile, the jury finding that he was twenty-eight years of age. He has assigned as error'the overruling, severally, of his motions for a new trial, to quash the affidavit, in arrest of judgment, and to modify the judgment.

The affidavit upon which he was prosecuted charged that on, etc., at, etc., appellant and two other defendants “did then and there transport intoxicating liquor in an automobile, contrary,” etc. The only objection to its sufficiency suggested by counsel is that it does not allege…