Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lexus Financial Services, Inc v. Trombly Tindall, PC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2004No. Docket No. 243472Published

1Dissent

COOPER, EJ.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case.

A careful review of the record indicates that Tindall & Co. purports to be the successor in interest to the lease. This is an impossibility. Defendant Trombly Tindall filed for bankruptcy. Fursuant to federal law, all property in which defendant Trombly Tindall had a *421legal or equitable interest, including the current lease, became property of the bankruptcy estate.1 The only party with a right to assign the lease after the commencement of the bankruptcy case was the trustee of the bankruptcy estate.2 To…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. BlachuraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API