Legal Opinion
American Stock Exchange, LLC v. Mopex, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 2002No. 00 Civ. 5943 SASPublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Mopex, Inc; (“Mopex”) has filed objections to the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael Dolinger (“R & R”), dated July 25, 2002, which recommends that the American Stock Exchange LLC’s (the “AMEX”) motion to preclude Mopex from asserting that the AMEX infringed claim 34 of Mopex’s United States Patent No. 6,088,685 (the ’685 patent’) be granted. I have duly considered Mopex’s objections. For the reasons set forth below, Mopex’s objections are denied, and Judge Dolinger’s R & R is accepted and adopted in full.
I. GENERAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., Appeal of Greenspan, Jaffe & Rosenblatt, Leon J. Greenspan, Paul D. Jaffe and Victor E. RosenblattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), Ltd. v. Coventry First LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lujan v. Cabana Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Arista Records LLC v. Usenet. Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Preuss v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Kunstler v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.