Marradi v. New Pete's, L.L.C.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) RAOUL MARRADI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 17-cv-12588-LTS ) NEW PETE’S, L.L.C. and 265 ) FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER September 12, 2019 SOROKIN, J. Now before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Bowler recommending that this Court allow in part 265 Franklin’s cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings and deny New Pete’s cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. After de novo review, the Court reaches a similar, but not identical, conclusion. The issue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Botosan v. Paul McNally RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Barclays Bank PLC v. PoynterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Downs v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Great Northern Insurance v. Paino AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005