Legal Opinion

Michaelis v. Farrell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 8, 2013No. 106,988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, J.:

This litigation arises out of a negligence action where the plaintiff, Jason Michaelis, sued the defendants, Gerald Farrell and Peggy Farrell, for an electrical shock he suffered while at the defendant’s property. A jury allowed recovery on plaintiffs claim. Moreover, the jury determined that Michaelis did not reasonably ascertain that he had sustained substantial injury until 5 years after receiving the electrical shock, which allowed him' to overcome the applicable 2-year statute of limitations hurdle. On appeal, the Far-rells contend that tire trial court erred in denying their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Davidson v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LCL, LLC v. FalenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
  2. Dumler v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. Davis v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  4. Eden v. WebbDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. Foxfield Villa Assocs. v. RobbenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API