Legal Opinion

Havlin v. Krulish

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1898Published

Appeal from judgment entered upon a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff for $1,000, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtSchuchman, J.

The action is brought to recover damages for personal injury. The evidence adduced at the trial establishes substantially the following facts:

On June 3,1897, the plaintiff, an infant of about sixteen years of age, was employed by the defendant in 'his marble factory, carried on, on the first and second floors of a building on Cherry street, which together with the stairway were hired by defendant for that purpose for the past seven years. There was a yard in front of the building. The entrance to the second floor was by a stairway on the front of the building, at the uptown or north comer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kunz v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Freeman v. Glens Falls Paper-Mill Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Glassheim v. New York Economical Printing Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Butcher v. HydeNew York City Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API