Legal Opinion

Glassheim v. New York Economical Printing Co.

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 3, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by William G-lassheim, as administrator, against the New York Economical Printing Company. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the minutes, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstayer, J.

This action was brought against Hugh Nesbitt and the New York Economical Printing Company for alleged negligence, whereby Samuel Glassheim suffered injuries from which he died. From the case it appears that the deceased was at the time of his death, on June 14,1893, about 28 years old, and had been for several years a painter in the employ of the defendant and Nesbitt. The defendant company was a domestic corporation engaged in the printing business at 24 and 26 Yesey street, in this city, occupying the entire building; as tenants of Robert Hoe, who furnished the power for the various…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burke v. . WitherbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Dougan v. . Champlain Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Weston v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Loftus v. . Union Ferry Company of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Stringham v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stratton v. C. H. Nichols Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Strode v. Columbia Box Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. CoughlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Horton v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Havlin v. KrulishCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API