Legal Opinion

State v. Spooner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 13, 2010No. 2009-260PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Following a jury trial, defendant Patrick Spooner was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child under eighteen years of age, in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 3252(d). On appeal, he argues that the trial court violated the Vermont Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clauses of Chapter I, Article 10 of the Vermont Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the trial court admitted certain tape-recorded statements from the victim rather than bringing the victim in to present live testimony. We affirm.

¶ 2. The record evidence may be briefly summarized…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. Harry Stephens, Jr. And Claude Lee HooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. State v. Aita GurungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. State v. BoglioliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. LampmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API