Legal Opinion

Greenberg, Fisk & Fielder v. Howell

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 29, 1984No. 05-84-00162-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARVER, Justice.

Greenberg, Fisk and Fielder, a professional corporation composed of practicing members of the Bar, in behalf of themselves and their clients in nine unrelated cases pending in the 191st Judicial District Court, seek mandamus directing the judge of said court, Charles Ben Howell, to set aside his orders holding their recusal motions (an identical motion on identical grounds was filed in each of the nine cases) “procedurally insufficient” and to require Judge Howell to obey Rule 18a TEX.R. CIV.P. (1983) by either recusing himself or entering an order of referral of such motions…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Qwest Microwave, Inc. v. Bedard, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. GREENBERG, BENSON, FISK AND FIELDER, PC v. Howell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Carson v. Gomez, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Carmody v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  5. WW Rodgers and Sons Produce Co. v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API