Legal Opinion

Jardine v. O'Hare

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Demubbeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

The defendant demurs to the complaint for insufficiency. The plaintiff, as heir at law and next of kin of his daughter Emma O’Hare, brings the action for the purpose of having it adjudged that he is the sole and absolute owner of all the real and personal estate of which she died seized and possessed, subject to the payment of her debts and funeral expenses and the expenses of adminis*34tration of her estate. The defendant, Franklyn O’Hare, was her husband. In March, 1900, he and his wife entered into an agreement of separation because of unhappy differences which had arisen between them. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryon v. BryonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Girard v. GirardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. Minier v. MarcouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of GriffithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  5. In re the Estate of LaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API