Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Griffith

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 20, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

The first question here is whether the widow of this testator has lost, by reason of a separation agreement, her standing as a “ person interested ” (Surr. Ct. Act, § 314, subd. 10), which is prerequisite in order for her to raise the further question whether her deceased husband had canceled his last will that has since been propounded as such in this proceeding.

The separation agreement was made in 1914 — a year before the will — and it recites that “ the duration of this agreement shall be for the joint lives of the respective parties.” It omits to bind also the heirs and legal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BurridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kernochan v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. In Re Estate of EdelmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Barnes v. KlugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re the Estate of McCaffreyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of WallaceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  4. In re the Estate of SaxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  5. In re the Estate of CollinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API