Legal Opinion

Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 12, 2020No. 4:17-cv-01892Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES BAIRD, et al., Case No. 17-cv-01892-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 364 10 BLACKROCK INSTITUTIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint administrative motion to seal certain portions 14 of the parties’ briefs related to the motion to exclude expert testimony of Russell Wermers (Dkt. 15 Nos. 321-3, 333-3, 336- 4) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. Dkt. No. 364. 16 Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API