Legal Opinion

Pierpoint v. Akin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1925No. 10,960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below and were defeated. Motion for new trial was dispensed with by the court and time allowed for bill of exceptions. This time was extended from time to time for nearly a year, because of the sickness of the stenographer, and then plaintiffs moved for a new trial, setting up that the court reporter had been so ill as to be unable to extend his notes and is “still unable to extend said notes and there is no prospect of his being able” to do so within one year from the date of the judgment, and that except by such extension it was impossible “to prepare…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borrowscale v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Sanders v. WiseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People Ex Rel. King v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dowell Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. v. Del-Rio Drilling Programs, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Knoll v. Allstate Fire & Casualty InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API