Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 2018No. Appeal 3-16-0478UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schmidt

*504 ¶ 1 Defendant, Mictavius T. Ross, argues that his unsentenced conviction for home invasion must be vacated based on one-act, one-crime principles. Defendant's unsentenced conviction is not a final judgment. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider its validity, and we dismiss defendant's appeal.

¶ 2 FACTS

¶ 3 A grand jury charged defendant with attempted armed robbery ( 720 ILCS 5/8-4(a), 18-2(a)(2) (West 2014) ) (count I), three counts of home invasion ( id. § 19-6(a)(3)-(5) ) (counts II through IV), and aggravated battery ( id. § 12-3.05(e)(1) ) (count V). Following a trial, a jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. LillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. RelerfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. BolarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brisco v. StinarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  2. People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API