People v. Ross
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schmidt
*504 ¶ 1 Defendant, Mictavius T. Ross, argues that his unsentenced conviction for home invasion must be vacated based on one-act, one-crime principles. Defendant's unsentenced conviction is not a final judgment. Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider its validity, and we dismiss defendant's appeal.
¶ 2 FACTS
¶ 3 A grand jury charged defendant with attempted armed robbery ( 720 ILCS 5/8-4(a), 18-2(a)(2) (West 2014) ) (count I), three counts of home invasion ( id. § 19-6(a)(3)-(5) ) (counts II through IV), and aggravated battery ( id. § 12-3.05(e)(1) ) (count V). Following a trial, a jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. LillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. RelerfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. BolarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brisco v. StinarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026