Legal Opinion · Dissent

Birth Mother v. Adoptive Parents

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2002No. 38572Published

1DissentRose, J.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the contract allowing the birth mother continued contact with the adopted child is unenforceable. The majority’s decision abrogates the appellant’s freedom to contract, which this court should refrain from doing unless absolutely necessary.1

As the majority notes, NAC 127.210(4)(c) authorizes child-placing agencies to offer open adoptions allowing continued contact between the adoptive family and the biological parent. Additionally, on its face, NRS 127.160 does not prohibit agreements like those permitted by NAC 127.210(4)(c). Thus, Nevada has no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. My Fair Lady of Georgia, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Home Shopping Club, Inc. v. Roberts Broadcasting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Shell Oil Company v. Ed Hoppe Realty Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Veness v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Miller v. a & R JOINT VENTURENevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API