Legal Opinion

People v. Kirkland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment reversed on the law, motion to preclude identification evidence granted and new trial granted. Memorandum: The CPL 710.30 notice served upon defendant failed to apprise him of the time, place and manner in which the identification of defendant was made (see, People v Lopez, 84 NY2d 425, 428). That defect could not be cured by discovery provided the day after arraignment (see, People v Lopez, supra, at 428-429; People v Scott, 222 AD2d 1004 [decided herewith]). Furthermore, defendant did not waive his right to preclusion by subsequently moving for suppression of the identification…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. RuizNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. MerrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. East, New York County Courts1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API