Legal Opinion

People v. Merrill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment reversed on the law, motion to preclude identification evidence granted and new trial granted. Memorandum: The notice served by the People pursuant to CPL 710.30 was inadequate because it failed to "inform defendant of the time, place and manner in which the identification was made” (People v Lopez, 84 NY2d 425, 428). It is of no moment that defendant suffered no prejudice, nor can the inadequacy of the notice be "cured by discovery” (People v Lopez, supra, at 428). Consequently, County Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to preclude the identification evidence. Defendant did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. BernierNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. McRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. LazzaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. KahleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. SturialeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API