Rugh v. Ottenheimer
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Baker County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Boise, J.:
This suit is in the nature of a cross-bill to an action of ejectment. It is claimed in the complaint that on the eleventh day of October, 1857, the plaintiff was married to *232one "William C. Rugh, whose wife she now is: 2. That on the * * day of August, 1856, the plaintiff, then a feme sole, purchased of one Daniel Sebastion a farm of one hundred and sixty acres of land situated in Washington county in this state; 3. That about the first day of March, 1869, plaintiff made a contract with one Nelson Gardner, whereby it rvas agreed that said land in Washington county…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitehead v. . WhiteheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peery v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Li v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- ACME Dairy Co. v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Springer v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Rose v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.