Legal Opinion
Neeley v. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided December 15, 2015No. Civil No: 15-54-GFVTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, United States District Judge
This lawsuit is one of many cases throughout the country concerning plaintiffs who were harmed by a generic version of the prescription drug metoclopramide and who now seek relief from the manufacturers of brand-name Reglan® for their injuries. This case was initially litigated in the Eastern *429District of Missouri but was transferred this Spring to the Eastern District of Kentucky. Plaintiff Harold Neeley, individually and on behalf of his deceased wife, asks the Court to reconsider a prior Eastern District of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the Umwa Combined Benefit Fund, (99-6110), Secretary of Health and Human Services, (99-6111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Irvin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Vanek v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023