Legal Opinion

McGrath Atty. Gen. v. Tadayasu Abo McGrath Atty. Gen. v. Kaname Furuya

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1951No. 12252_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

These are appeals 1 from two decrees based on findings that each of some 4315 plaintiffs below, Japanese descended native born United States citizens, was coerced by the conditions at the Tule Lake concentration camp in California, such conditions being caused by the United States officials having the plaintiffs in their charge, into a mental condition causing each against his or her free will to execute a document, procured in a proceeding before the Attorney General.under § 401 (i) of the Nation ality Act of 1940, as amended, 2 renouncing the plaintiff’s American…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perkins v. ElgSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Ludecke v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Savorgnan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  4. Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath Atty. Gen. Of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API