State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Delano Community Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentGardebring, Justice
I respectfully dissent. While I agree with the legal principles articulated by the majority in this case, I would reach the opposite conclusion. My examination of the record before us persuades me that DCDC’s declared purpose and historical conduct plainly demonstrate that it is a nonprofit corporation and, therefore, that its assets may not legally be distributed to its shareholders.
This case calls upon us to determine the legal nature of DCDC. If DCDC is, as the majority states, a corporation formed for-profit, the shareholders have the power under law to dissolve the corporation and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Longcor v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.