State Ex Rel. Witte v. Smith, Judge
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator by his petition asks respondent to grant relator’s requests, first, for the appointment Of counsel at public expense, second, for appointment of a special judge and, third, a hearing upon his petition for a writ of error coram nobis now pending in respondent’s court. Relator is not entitled to the appointment of counsel at public expense. State ex rel. Jones v. Hornaday, Judge, No. 27,783, post p. 645, this day decided. He admits in his petition that the writ of error coram nobis may be reviewed only by the court that sentenced him and-in which his petition for writ of error coram…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hodshire v. Bingham, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Murphy v. DalyIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Emmert v. GentryIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Porcelli v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1969
- Bolton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Meyer v. YoungbloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.