Legal Opinion

Gerardi v. Hofstra University

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 24, 1995No. Civ. A. CV-93-0586 (DGT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRAGER, District Judge:

Plaintiff filed this employment discrimination action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623, claiming that defendant, Hofs-tra University (“Hofstra”), failed to hire her based on her age. Before the Court is Hofs-tra’s motion for summary judgment.

Background

In June, 1990, Hofstra posted an advertisement seeking to hire an Advisement Counsel- or. Gerardi Aff. ¶9; Def.’s Mem.Supp. Summ.J.; Spencer Aff. ¶7. In this announcement, Hofstra indicated that the applicants were, at a minimum, required to possess a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
Ford Motor Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

New York State Department of Correctional Services v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
Walsh v. United Cable Technologies Services Corporations & Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999