Legal Opinion
Lane v. Phelps
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 4, 2011No. Civ. 09-939-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kennard Lane (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, filed this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He proceeds pro se and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauper-is. Presently before the court is the motion to dismiss of State defendants Perry Phelps (“Phelps”) and Carl Danberg (“Danberg”) (together “defendants”) 1 and plaintiffs motions to amend. 2 (D.I. 24, 29, 38) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons discussed, the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenfield v. Budget of Delaware, IncSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Shabazz v. Delaware Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020