Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martens v. State, Department of Highways

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1981No. 4756Published

1DissentMatthews, Justice

Civil Rule 72(k) provides that a property owner in a condemnation suit is not entitled to costs and attorney’s fees unless(2) the award of the court was at least ten (10) percent larger than ... the allowance of the master from which an appeal was taken, or(4) allowance of costs and attorney’s fees appears necessary to achieve a just and adequate compensation of the owner.

Here the master’s allowance from which the appeal was taken was $218,700.00 and the award of the court was $182,650.00, some 16.41% smaller than the master’s allowance.

I believe that the only sensible construction of parts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HutchinsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. 10 Acres More or LessAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Inglima v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API