Legal Opinion

Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of Harrison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1926No. 5208PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

Originally, warehouse receipts were not by our statute authorized to be pledged as collateral; but by the act of *760October 3, 1887, such receipts were expressly made a subject of pledge. Acts 1887, p. 36; Civil Code (1910), § 3528; Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock, 103 Ga. 171, 178 (29 S. E. 752). A warehouse receipt is a mere symbol of property. It is a shadow of the absent substance. When it passes from one hand to another, it is only symbolic of the- property is represents. If it represents no property, its holder has nothing but a scrap of paper. Planters Rice Mill Co. v. Merchants Nat.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Planters' Rice-Mill Co. v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock & CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. National Bank v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Bank of Sparta v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Stapleton v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Graham v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Continental Trust Co. v. Tennille Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API