Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of Harrison
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
Originally, warehouse receipts were not by our statute authorized to be pledged as collateral; but by the act of *760October 3, 1887, such receipts were expressly made a subject of pledge. Acts 1887, p. 36; Civil Code (1910), § 3528; Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock, 103 Ga. 171, 178 (29 S. E. 752). A warehouse receipt is a mere symbol of property. It is a shadow of the absent substance. When it passes from one hand to another, it is only symbolic of the- property is represents. If it represents no property, its holder has nothing but a scrap of paper. Planters Rice Mill Co. v. Merchants Nat.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Planters' Rice-Mill Co. v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Citizens Banking Co. v. Peacock & CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- National Bank v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Bank of Sparta v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Continental Trust Co. v. Bank of HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Stapleton v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Graham v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Continental Trust Co. v. Tennille Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.