Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Perry

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 14, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.

This action for damages for personal injuries to the infant plaintiff, Peggy Florence Perry, resulted, upon the second trial, in a verdict and judgment for $2500 against the Railway. Upon the first trial a verdict for $2000 was set aside by the Circuit Judge because he could not rest satisfied with the verdict. „Upon the second trial he stated that the ease had'given him a great deal of concern, but that he would overrule the motion of defendant for a new trial. Thereupon a motion in arrest of judgment was made, and on the next day it was heard and overruled. Then occurred the following…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SmithwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Curran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hurt v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hamburger v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duling v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  2. Garis v. EberlingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Merriman v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. HutsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Union Traction Co. v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API