Cummings v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from her conviction for driving while intoxicated, a third offense within five years, Valerie Cummings contends (1) that her conviction violated the prohibition against double jeopardy, and (2) that the Commonwealth was collaterally estopped from prosecuting her for driving while intoxicated (DWI) because at an administrative license suspension hearing, the district court found no probable cause for her arrest. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On August 7, 1995, Ms. Cummings was arrested for driving while intoxicated “2nd or subsequent offense,”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Evans-Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Rosser v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Low v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Martin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Wadkins v. Robert Arnold, and the First Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Alex Michael Ramos v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Wadkins v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000