Legal Opinion

Mateer v. Union Pacific Systems

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1993No. 62890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

This is an appeal by Union Pacific Systems (railroad) after a verdict and judgment in favor of Jerry Mateer in an action brought pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (PELA).

Mateer began working for the railroad in 1960. During the next twenty-four years he performed many and varied duties as part of his employment. He is now working for railroad as an inspector. In February, 1984, he was a machinist. From February, 1984, until March, 1985, and from November, 1985, to April, 1987, his work consisted of lubricating railroad locomotives. He worked in a four-foot deep…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Moore v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. West v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Anderson v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bailey v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Leake v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Roth v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API