Legal Opinion

Moore v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 25, 1992No. 73587PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Chief Justice.

We granted transfer in this case to consider two questions of general interest: First, whether evidence of collateral source payments is admissible in a Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) case where such evidence is volunteered by the plaintiff in a nonresponsive answer on cross-examination; and second, whether testimony regarding a routine diagnostic examination of plaintiff requested by the defendant’s medical expert and administered by a physical therapist is within the scope of Rule 60.01.

The trial court answered both of these questions in the affirmative.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Eickmann v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Theodore Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  4. George Lange v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Shaw v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Nelson v. WaxmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Wright v. BarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API