Legal Opinion

Bidwell v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1901No. 3969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — lion. Ti-iad ITuston, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tke opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

The city of Tacoma, in the year 1892-, levied a tax against lot 4, block 2118, Barlow’s Addition, in the sum of $186.72, for municipal purposes. On February 6, 1893, these taxes not having been paid, and being delinquent, the city caused this property to be sold to pay the taxes, and the same was bid in by one E. Steinbach for the sum of $214.97, being the amount then due for taxes, interest, penalty, and costs. A certificate of sale was issued to Steinbach therefor. Thereafter on November 10, 1893, Steinbach transferred this certificate *520to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Inhabitants of LinneusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883
  2. Warner v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Bisbee v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. New York Security & Trust Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Keyes v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API