Van Etten v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank S. Rossetti, J.
This claim is for damages arising from injuries sustained by claimant in a fall on a sidewalk along a State highway. Claimant contends defendant’s negligent construction and maintenance created a dangerous condition which caused her fall and consequential injuries. The State claims it did not construct the dangerous condition and was not responsible for the maintenance of the sidewalk where the condition was located. Upon the parties’ stipulation, the court ordered the trial bifurcated, with liability being tried in the instant proceeding and damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lopes v. RostadNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Neddo v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Neddo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirschner v. Town of WoodstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Flynn v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Home Office Reference Laboratory, Inc. v. AxelrodNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Nado v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993