Legal Opinion
Colleran v. Cassidento
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 21, 1992No. 10067PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting an application to vacate an arbi*387tration award based on a lack of notice to the plaintiffs as required by General Statutes § 52-413.
The defendant claims that the trial court improperly granted the plaintiffs’ application because (1) the plaintiffs successfully asserted that they were not parties to the arbitration agreement thereby estopping them from later asserting an inconsistent position, (2) the plaintiffs were not parties to the arbitration agreement and, thus, lacked standing to file the application to vacate the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- O'Sullivan v. BergentySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Dayco Corp. v. Fred T. Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blondeau v. BaltierraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- B B Corp. v. Lafayette Am. bank/trust, No. Cv93 30 98 76 S (May 20, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Langston v. Housing Auth., Bridgeport, No. Cv95 032 31 03 S (Aug. 3, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999