Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 2013PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered October 22, 2012, which granted the motion of defendant New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) to correct the rate of interest on the judgment from 9% to 3% pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1212 (6), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is uncontested that the rate of interest against NYCTA may be no more than 3% (Public Authorities Law § 1212 [6]). As defendants were found jointly and severally liable for 100% of the judgment, the proper interest rate was 3% (see Bello v New York City Tr. Auth., 50 AD3d 511 [1st Dept…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kiker v. Nassau CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Klos v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Bello v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Ebert v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keenan v. MolloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Mata v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Zahavi v. JSBarkats PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Soltero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Soltero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API