Legal Opinion

Motyka v. Nappier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1969No. 6910SC60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The allegations of the complaint as they relate to defendants Kirk, except where quoted, may be summarized as follows:(a) That defendant Nappier was the duly qualified and acting executor of the Will of Ralph Allen, deceased.(b) That the Will of Ralph Allen directed the executor to sell all of the property of the estate, including real estate.(e)That at the time of his death Ralph Allen owned a tract of land in Wake County containing about 218 acres.(d) That on 21 March 1966 defendant Nappier as executor, in consideration of the sum of $100.00, privately executed to defendant Clarence M. Kirk…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Felton v. . FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. W. J. Sprinkle v. . E. Nye HutchinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Gray v. . ArmisteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Latimer v. MechlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Helgesson v. Estate of FrankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API