Legal Opinion
Rucker v. City of Ocala
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 5, 1996No. 95-3224PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
684 So.2d 836 (1996)
Benjamin RUCKER, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF OCALA and Crawford & Co., Appellees.
No. 95-3224.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 5, 1996.
Rehearing Denied January 10, 1997.
Barbara L. Richard, Ocala, for appellant.
Betty D. Marion, Ocala, for appellees.
KAHN, Judge.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the claimant, Benjamin Rucker, challenges the constitutionality of section 440.13(5)(e), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). The statute in question delineates and limits the medical witnesses who may testify in a workers' compensation case. This limitation, argues…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Ryan's Furniture Exchange, Inc. v. McNairSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Moser v. Barron Chase Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Medina v. Gulf Coast Linen ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Isaac v. Green Iguana, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. HoferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Union Camp Corp. v. HurstDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.