Legal Opinion

City of Painesville, Ohio v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 16, 2026No. 1:26-cv-01433Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITY OF PAINESVILLE, OHIO, ) CASE NO. 1:26-cv-1433 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE CHARLES E. FLEMING ) v. ) ) BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ) ORDER DENYING PRELIMINARY OHIO, INC., ) INJUNCITION ) ) Defendant. ) Before the Court are Plaintiff City of Painesville, Ohio’s (“City”) motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (“TRO Motion”) (ECF No. 1-1, PageID #1–15). For the reasons that follow, the TRO Motion is DENIED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 23, 2026, the City filed a Verified Complaint against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Southern Glazer's Distributors of Ohio, LLC v. Great Lakes Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Vernon Stenberg, Sr. v. Cheker Oil Company and Marathon Oil Company, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. V & M STAR STEEL v. Centimark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API