Legal Opinion

Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

Lamar Advantage GP Company, LLC (Lamar) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) finding that Council Bill No.2011-1916 was validly enacted by Pittsburgh City Council (City Council). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court.

On March 9, 2010, Council Bill No.2010-0216 was introduced into City Council. It amended Title Nine (Zoning), Chapters 907, 919 and 921 of the Pittsburgh Code “by revising various sections relating to Electronic Message Signs, creating a definition and requirements for Electronic…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schultz v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Willey AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Penneco Oil Co. v. County of FayetteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nether Providence Township v. ColettaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. C.N. Diefenderfer and B.A. Diefenderfer, his wife v. Palmer Twp. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. K. Karol v. Smithfield Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API