Legal Opinion

Plummer v. Ash

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1913No. 18,277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Stanton district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in an action to quiet the title to several tracts of land. Service was made by publication against Anna F. R. Coffin, a nonresident. An attorney appeared and filed an answer for her. The case was tried in regular course of practice, and upon the issues relating to the tract in question here a judgment was rendered on April 10, 1906, against' the plaintiff in favor of defendant Coffin, setting aside a tax deed under which the plaintiff claimed title and giving to him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Rush v. RushTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Reid v. MortonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dresser v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Aydelotte v. John S. Brittain & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miami County Nat. Bank of Paola, Kan. v. BancroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. State v. LinderholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Thornton v. Van HornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. State v. FrameSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. Faler v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API